Donald F. Featherstone (20 March 1918 – 3 September 2013) was a British author of more than forty books on wargaming and military history.
Featherstone was born in London.[1] and during the Second World War, he joined the Royal Armoured Corps. An account of his war experiences can be found in his book Lost Tales.[2] Professionally a physiotherapist living in Southampton,[1] Featherstone was first introduced to wargaming by reading H. G. Wells' Little WarsGeekbench 4 0 3. and his first opponent was his brother. His second opponent was Tony Bath many years later in 1955. His wife saw a description of a solo wargame being played in Southampton by Tony Bath and Don then got in touch.[3][4][5]
In 1960 the two of them began editing the UK version of the War Game Digest, a seminal wargaming newsletter started by Jack Scruby. Featherstone expressed disapproval of a trend towards articles 'attempting to spread an aura of pseudo-science over what is a pastime'.[6]
After a discussion with Paddy Griffith, Featherstone realised that wargaming as a hobby could considerably aid in understanding military history.[7] He started his own periodical in 1962, the Wargamers' Newsletter. He produced this each month without a gap, with 214 editions until January 1980.
In 1961, he organised the first UK wargames convention at his home in Southampton.[8] Two years later he organized the first National Wargames Championships Convention at a local hotel which was attended by about a hundred wargamers from all over the country. In 1977 he was one of the founder members of the British Commission for Military History.[9] Featherstone appeared on the BBC in 1978 to promote the hobby.[10]
Death
The enjoyment of wargaming is greatly enhanced if the battles (games) are played within well thought-out scenarios. Instead of simply lining up evenly-matched armies and fighting to the death, the players can have realistic objectives (such as the capture of a vital piece of terrain or delaying a superior enemy to cover a retreat) and be confronted with more challenging tactical decisions.
A computer based wargaming community for the appreciation of historical wargames. The miniatures are virtual, rulesets/opponents are often handled by the AI! Touching history with digital Hex and chits.
Spain 20: The Peninsular War is a strategic wargame playable in a short time and with 4 options key battles of the Napoleonic wars. 4 table games in one box. From Draco Ideas.
Donald Featherstone died on 3 September 2013, aged 95, from complications following a fall at home.[11][12]
Bibliography
War Games (1962) A revised edition has been printed as part of the History of Wargaming Project (see here)
Tackle Model Soldiers This Way, Stanley Paul, London, 1963; ISBN none issued
Naval War Games, Stanley Paul, London, 1965, ISBN 0-09-076581-8, Updated edition 2009[13]
Air War Games (1966)
Bowmen of England (1967)
At Them with the Bayonet! The First Sikh War (1968)
Advanced War Games, Stanley Paul, London, 1965, ISBN 0-09-087350-5, reprinted 2008
War Game Campaigns (1970) reprinted 2009 [14]
Battles with Model Soldiers (1970)
Military Modelling (1970)
MacDonald of the 42nd (1971)
Poitiers 1356: Knight's Battles for Wargamers (1972)
War Games through the Ages: Vol. 1 3000BC-1500AD, Stanley Paul, 1972; ISBN 0-09-110240-5
Solo Wargaming, Kaye & Ward, London 1973; ISBN 0 7182 0921 4. Reprinted 2009
Tank battles in miniature: A wargamers' guide to the Western Desert Campaign in 1940-1942 (1973)
Battle Notes for Wargamers, David & Charles, 1973; ISBN 0-7153-6310-7 Revised 2011
War Games through the Ages: Vol. 2 1420-1783, Stanley Paul, 1974; ISBN 0-09-118760-5
War Games through the Ages: Vol. 3 1792-1879, Stanley Paul, 1975; ISBN 0-09-121250-2
Skirmish Wargaming, Patrick Stephens Limited, 1975; ISBN 0-85059-197-X; new edition 2009
Wargaming: Ancient and Medieval Periods. David & Charles, UK, 1975; ISBN 0-7153-6939-3. Hippocrene Books, USA, 1975. ISBN 0-88254-353-9.
War Games through the Ages: Vol. 4 1861-1945 (1976)
Tank battles in miniature: A wargamers' guide to Mediterranean Campaigns 1943-1945. Patrick Stephens Limited, 1977; ISBN 0-85059-275-5
Featherstone's Complete Wargaming, David & Charles, 1989; ISBN 0-7153-9262-X
Victoria's Enemies: An A-Z of British Colonial Warfare (1989)
The Peninsular War, Argus Books, 1991; ISBN 1 85486 028 3
Victorian Colonial Warfare: Africa, from the Campaigns Against the Kaffirs to the South African War (1992)
Victorian Colonial Warfare: India: From the Conquest of Sind to the Indian Mutiny
Khartoum 1885: General Gordon's last stand (1993)
Tel El-Kebir 1882 : Wolseley's Conquest of Egypt (1993)
The History of the English Longbow (1993)
Omdurman 1898 : Kitchener's victory in the Sudan (1994)
Weapons and Equipment of the Victorian Soldier (1996)
Redcoats for the Raj, Valda Publishing, UK, 1996; ISBN 0-9526861-0-4
Warriors and Warfare in Ancient and Medieval Times (1997)
Khaki & Red: Soldiers of the Queen in India and Africa (1997)
Bridges of Battle: Famous Battlefield Actions at Bridges and River Crossings (1999)
Bowmen of England (2003)
The Battlefield Walker's Handbook (2005)
Donald Featherstone's Lost Tales (2009) ISBN 978-1-4092-9431-3
Donald Featherstone's The Badgered Men: A novel describing the life of the Victorian cavalry man at the time of the First Sikh War 1845-1846 (2011) ISBN 9781470944018
Donald Featherstone's Wargaming Commando Operations: A novel describing the life of the Victorian cavalry man at the time of the First Sikh War 1845-1846 (2013) ISBN 9781291398915
^Donald Featherstone's Lost Tales (2009); ISBN 978-1-4092-9431-3, pp 173-174
^It was attended by almost every known wargamer in the UK at that time, including Tony Bath, Charles Grant, Stan Aspinall, Bill Mell, Ted Suren, David Chandler, Brigadier Peter Young DSC, MC
^Observation made in 2008 for Featherstone’s 90th Birthday : “I suspect that Don Featherstone has had a greater influence on amateur – and even professional – military history and historians in this country than many would suspect or acknowledge.” Editor of the British Commission for Military History Newsletter Mars & Clio
^Timeline of the Historical Miniatures Wargaming Hobby
^Notice of death of Donald Featherstone, wargamer.com
^Donald Featherstone - obituary, The Telegraph
^, History of Wargaming ProjectNaval War Games
^, History of Wargaming ProjectWar Game Campaigns
Help improve this article
Compiled by World Heritage Encyclopedia™ licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 Help to improve this article, make contributions at the Citational Source, sourced from Wikipedia
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
Released 01 Dec 2019
John Tiller Software recently followed up its 2015 tactical battles game Bonaparte’s Peninsular War (BPW) with the concluding volume of Napoleon’s War in Spain, the aptly named Wellington’s Peninsular War (WPW). This second title begins in 1809 and covers Britain’s attempt to drive the French from Spain, ending with Wellington’s invasion of southern France. Yes, the battles of Orthes and Toulouse (arguably a French victory and fought after the Emperor’s abdication) are here, as well as a side excursion to the battle of Maida in Italy, thus beginning endless arguments over column vs line.
Spain has always been very popular with English speaking gamers because, a) they won, b) the French lost, c) there were lots of battles involving redcoats, and d) the battlefield and operational environment was so much different than northern and Central Europe.
French General de Beurnonville described the turf thusly:
There are no roads, no transport, no houses, no shops, no provisions in a country where the people warm themselves in the sun and live on nothing. The Spaniard is brave, daring, and proud – the perfect assassin. This race resembles no other. It values only itself and loves only God whom it serves very badly.
It also makes this campaign tougher to model than Waterloo or Russia, but relax, JTS was more than up to the task.
The Good
This article won’t discuss the nut and bolts of the game this time around, such as hardware requirements or basic gameplay. The game engine running the Napoleonic, Musket & Pike, pretty much all these series is a good 20 + years old, harkening back to when John Tiller was first getting started at Talonsoft. In its present modified form, it owes much to 2018’s Seven Years War, but nevertheless, the engine pretty much runs and works the same way. Improvements thereof were evolutionary as opposed to revolutionary, and if nothing else, assures a platform that is very reliable and stable. For those interest in things like scale, movement, combat with units and so on, the late Jim Cobb wrote an excellent review on Bonaparte’s Peninsular War back in 2015, while a review of the Seven Years War game in 2018 brought everything up to currency.
However, there were a few changes developed for this iteration, most designed to specifically model warfare in the anything but flat Spanish terrain. The changes include the use of two gun artillery sections instead of entire batteries, the possibility of disorder or rout when moving near enemy troops in good order (and the Spanish, in particular, have a lot of abysmal militia within their ranks), 10 minute turns as opposed to 15 minute, increased movement and disorder penalties due the greater amount of rough terrain, and isolated units unable to initiate combat. The game also increases infantry firepower, decreases cavalry melee strength and defines a command radius for all levels of command, army to battery commander.
While the changes may seem minor, they can make a significant impact. Here it's wise to remember that battles in Spain are invariably smaller than battles in central Europe, with broken terrain and a veritable dearth of cavalry and artillery by comparison. And unlike the Prussians in 1806, all armies can deploy skirmishers, not just the French. When combined with everything above, the game does an excellent job of simulating Napoleonic warfare on less than Napoleonic battlefields. I played battles from Wellington’s invasion of France over the weekend and thought the gameplay and results very historical. The Anglo-Portuguese won the battle of Orthes, while Soult once again gave Welly fits at Toulouse.
And really, the scenarios included are the biggest reason for forking over $39.95 US. There are over 180 scenarios, many variants of the same battle to be sure, played out over 50 maps, the largest with 55,000 hexes. Of these, 60 were specifically designed for play against the computer AI, French or Allied. And although all the big-name battles such as Vitoria and Salamanca are present, so are a host of smaller battles or even larger fare few people have heard of. I’ve already mentioned Orthes and Toulouse, but the game also provides the siege of Zaragoza. And if you’re just dying to recreate the charge of Napoleon’s soon to be Polish Lancers of the Imperial Guard against those Spanish guns, you’ll be happy to know that the battle for the mountain pass at Somosierra is part of the package.
Seriously, this makes the game a steal. Think not? Well, if by chance you can find a copy of the old Clash of Arms battalion level game on Corunna, it’ll set you back €130.00 plus shipping. At brigade (not battalion as is WPW), the still in print OSG Napoleon’s Quagmire will give you four battles for $98.00. Its not rocket science folks.
The Bad
I really had only a couple of gameplay related issues with WPW, one I already spoke about in my review on JTS’s Seven Years’ War. Again, this is an industry related problem that may well be too-hard-to-do material. The units are still too flexible in their movement, looking like Porsche’s zipping hither during a TV Christmas commercial without any regard to the friendly or enemy units around them. Yes, by drill regulation they could do it, but alignment and control was crucial back then, so commanders simply would not allow it. Likewise, reacting to the unexpected was a painfully slow process, rarely done without someone with very gold epaulettes giving permission. Its tough to make a 21st Century gamer act like a 19th Century general, and the game’s leadership system (which is about giving combat and morale recovery modifiers) is inadequate, likely by design.
As regards WPW specifically, I only found one gameplay concern. While most people credit vaunted British firepower from a two-rank line as the raison d’etre for stopping French infantry attacks in their tracks, continuing study has proven this false. Per regulation and doctrine, French commanders consistently tried to deploy into line for fire and the final advance, but an impromptu redcoat bayonet charge almost always caught them in the act and sent them reeling in disorder. If the British allowed the deployment, the French normally shot them silly. As Ensign Andrew Leith Hay observed at Salamanca in 1812, “the only way is to get at them at once with the bayonet, that they can never stand, but as to firing, that the French will do as long as you like, and they fire much better than we do.”
So far as I can determine, there is nothing in the game that adequately simulates this practice, one so pervasive as to be considered automatic.
And the Ugly
And I mean, really, REALLY ugly. OK, I do realize I am delving big time into the realm of pure personal preference here, but IMHO the 3D graphics in the game are some of the worst I’ve seen, particularly the terrain. In contrast to the original Talonsoft series which used a “painted” terrain overlay, JTS stuff has long used a menu of roughly drawn generic hex patterns linked together to form a battlefield that is very granular, garish and harsh in presentation. Add to this a color palette that is a semi neon lime green color and you have something that not only looks bad but is very hard on the eyes. Dead serious now, but at normal 3D magnification I found it difficult – sometimes impossible – to find small units on the map, especially detached skirmishers, or commanders. Turning the bases on helped in the location, but not looks department, and determining elevation was a real chore. This is because WPW presents slopes as just an additional layer of hexes dropped on top of another. When you are fighting over real estate that is very hilly to begin with, this makes gameplay exceedingly tough. You cannot make out what’s a hill and what isn’t in many cases. In other nits, even big cities use more northern European buildings with dirt road patterns that remind me of places like Tombstone. Similarly, the Medieval walls of Toulouse look like garden walls any soldier can step over. JMTSW, and I’ve never been a fan of this methodology, but with WPW my visual experience has actually moved from just looks to negative gameplay impact.
And it really didn’t have to be this way. JTS BPW has the same system, but used a much softer, almost beige palette and doesn’t look half bad. Certainly, there are less problems finding and identifying units. Likewise, most all other JTS tactical games, such as the Mexican American War, have recently (as in November this year) received upgrades to the same softer, painted style found in the firm’s American Civil War battlefield series. These look exceptional, and this is without any modification to unit sprites. Change the latter and we’re talking life changing here, but regardless I think it way past time to retire this current graphics presentation package.
Fortunately, you do have the 2D switch with NATO symbology, looking very professional, easy to understand, just as I found when I first saw the redo in Seven Years War. Also, in this case, the somber colored 2D terrain palette more accurately captures the bleakness of the country, and I’ve been there.
But get it anyway!
Because you can easily flip to 2D until the 3D update comes out (hint, hint, JTS), and the game engine is as solid as ever. There are no bugs to speak of and gameplay is fast, fun and accurate. Combined with the almost obscene number of scenarios provided (plus the inclusion of all those otherwise little known but fun battles), and you’ve another reason cardboard counter games on the subject have cause for worry. Overall WPW is an excellent game with attractive pricing and represents yet another nail in boardgaming’s coffin.
JTS, please grab your hammer and continue.
Available on:
Comments
Related Posts from Wargamer
Campaign Shenandoah Review
06 Nov 20191
Review: France '40 Gold
16 Jan 20194
Review: Campaign Petersburg
23 Nov 20170
Featured
The Steam Tabletop Fest has begun! Live sessions and discounted games for the next week
22 Oct 20200
Best Mobile Strategy Wargame
The Complete Guide to Combat Mission
08 Sep 20209
Upcoming War Board & Miniature Games 2020
30 Jul 20206
Upcoming Wargames 2020
06 Oct 202013
Fantasy General II: Empire Aflame Review
22 Oct 20200
Wargamer of the Weekly Suns
23 Oct 20201
Ultimate Admiral: Age of Sail's commitment to the era really helps bring the history alive